Evidence standard

Scientific Review

Publication standard · Last reviewed August 31, 2026

Scope before certainty

Review begins by identifying what a source actually studied: its location, ecosystem, event, method, observation period and outcome. A result from one landscape is not rewritten as a rule for all landscapes.

Source hierarchy

  1. Primary research, official monitoring reports and research repositories.
  2. Government or university syntheses that link to underlying methods.
  3. Institutional explainers for definitions and public context.

Secondary reporting may help find a topic, but important ecological claims should resolve to a traceable primary or authoritative source.

Claim checks

  • Separate fire intensity from ecological burn severity.
  • Separate primary from secondary succession.
  • Name the measured indicator instead of saying an ecosystem has simply “recovered.”
  • State when a sequence is a general model rather than a prediction.
  • Identify visual metaphor as metaphor.
  • Keep emergency and treatment decisions with responsible local authorities.

Review labels

Every article includes a publication date and last-reviewed date. A review confirms that the linked sources support the published wording at that time; it is not a claim of formal academic peer review.